Skip to main content

Grief as a channelizing force


Meeting friends after long is always a pleasure, but this time it left me with mixed emotions. A realization dawned – somewhere down the line I missed the bus. Even with the rose-tinted glasses I occasionally sport, the chances of revival appear bleak.

20s is when possibility overshadows actuality; 30s signals the end of this honeymoon (or delusion?). It’s common for many in their 20s to think that they can successfully pursue many streams of work simultaneously. But this is fool’s errand. To attain even a decent depth in any discipline demands large amounts of time and dedication. For every turn we take in the road of life, the opportunity to traverse several other roads is precluded forever. To take up the path we desire, we must renounce several others permanently.

The hardest part of this learning process is that life seldom affords man an unlimited choice. The endeavor to taste food in all the leading restaurants of your city can be realized effortlessly, but many life choices progressively narrow down your future options. Take one’s profession: once one gathers a cumulative work experience in a particular area he cannot escape its virtuous (or sometimes vicious) circle easily; only an extraordinary change of circumstances might result in career transition.

This is not to say that we can never take a U turn – sometimes, tremendous will and efforts coupled with a bit of luck can work wonders. This, however, is still an anomaly and can hardly be expected in a measure we have come to believe through popular media. A sufficiently ingrained survivorship bias might offer hope, but as experience steadily exposes us to diverse situations and men, many find it difficult to put their faith on the over-hyped success formulas or mantras. Most of our confusions today can be traced to mainstream propaganda of absolutizing of choices - i.e. relentless expansion of choices, without recognizing that decisions come at a price of removing other possibilities from purview.

Grief, in this sense, is the “can’t” vibration – 'thus far and not a step beyond'.

Grief frees us from the delusional abundance of choice – from the limitations imposed on us we become aware of the very few roads available to us. This, paradoxically, is comforting to most men because the boundary-lines have been marked. So, instead of daydreaming about what’s well beyond reach it behooves him as a man to concentrate on what appears achievable.

The past cannot be argued against: it is what it is, it is final. When mind loses its grip on reality, it succumbs to insanity to protect the organism against wholesale destruction. The thread of memory is snapped to prevent the destructive mental virus from overwhelming the life-force. Grief is nature’s way of asking man to avoid the memory of suffering and guide him towards embracing his limitations, faults and inferiority.

In our more sober moments, it hits us that we truly are on our own in this world. Men, and here I speak of men alone, cannot ask for a shoulder to cry on without inviting reproach because society is conditioned to look upon failed men as an encumbrance. There is no other way to play this game, save to master its rules. Either way, the least a man can do is to not expect empathy - it hasn't worked before, it won't now, and it can't till humans are essentially a reproducing species in which men are the disposable gender for the population project.

You got the raw deal, now what? Would you ponder over the injustice or unfairness forever, or become mindful of the surrounding environment and make the best of a bad bargain?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The concept of Dharma in Ramayana

The concept of Dharma is not adequately understood by Hindus themselves, not to mention others. Dharma is not a set of do’s and don’t’s or a simplistic evaluation of good and bad. It requires considerable intellectual exertion to even begin understanding Dharma, let alone mastering its use.

Is Dharma Translatable?
Few words of a language cannot be faithfully translated into another without injuring its meaning, context & spirit. English translations of Dharma are blurred and yield words like religion, sense of righteousness, discrimination between good and bad, morals and ethics or that which is lawful. All these fall short of fully grasping the essence of Dharma.
Every language has an ecosystem of words, categories and grammar which allow a user to stitch words together to maximum effect such that meaning permeates the text without necessarily being explicitly explained at each point. Sanskrit words such dharma, karma, sloka, mantra, guru etc., now incorporated in English, lose thei…

The Controversial Caste System of Hinduism

Imagine concepts like feudal system, slavery, capitalistic exploitation and anti-Semitism being used to define the core of Christianity! Christians will be outraged at this inappropriate mixing of the core universal values of Christians and societal & historical aspects which merely existed in a Christian world.
Now this raises the question – why is caste system defined as the core of Hinduism? Especially as “caste” itself is a western construct. Sounds irrelevant?
Okay. Now imagine concepts like slave-trade, war on infidels, brutal subjugation of masses, temple destruction, and forceful conversions marking the core of Islam.
It is considered sensible to first understand what the core scriptures speak about the religion and its universal values. The ills of the community & its societal aspects are differentiated from its core philosophy.
Now, this brings us to the most interesting question – why is Caste System (caste based on birth) propagated to be the defining feature of Hindu…

How Linguistic States strengthened Indian Unity

Be like a garland maker, O king; not like a charcoal burner.” --Mahabharata
[It asks the king to preserve and protect diversity, in a coherent way. The metaphor used is that of a garland, in which flowers of many colors and forms are strung together for a pleasing effect. The contrast is given against charcoal, which is the result of burning all kinds of wood and reducing diversity to homogeneous dead matter. The charcoal burner is reductionist and destroys diversity, whereas the garland maker celebrates diversity.]
Unification of Germany and Italy populated by similar people was achieved by huge armies spanning across decades. In sharp contrast, India under Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel managed to unite a much larger area divided by culture & languages within few years.
The European experience where new nations were carved over little differences in identity, made the Indian experiment appear poised for a breakup sooner than later. Yet, India managed to stay united though the journey wa…